o Felicitaciones! (hablando en cristiano)
Un abrazo che

Regards,

Daniel

Everything is fixed right now. It was a CSS bug. I’m trying to not use more than 3 font sizes, and no more than 2 typefaces (Helvetica and Palatino).

Great foresight and class on your part. I have perhaps become a bit jaded with the number of sites blatantly stealing designs, though I did notice that there were a few substantive differences. The influence is unmistakable, but we’ve all got our heroes. At least it has design. +)

I’m curious about something in your design, then. The comment body type is larger, and seems to escape its containing dd/dl/div (one or more of ‘em), at least with FF 2.0.0.18 on WinXP. More than the overflow, though, the larger type creates–for me–a schizm in the visual flow. Taking Khoi’s work as inspiration, we see he maintains the same size and weight of type in his comments as in his post, using the gridlines as differentiators. I wonder if there is a way to distinguish the comments visually, subtly, that doesn’t disrupt the visual flow. Of course, these are my unschooled opinions.

Wishing you continued success.

Daniel

I love Khoi’s stuff, and he’s a wonderful inspiring designer to me, everyday. In fact, I did send my site to him so he can check it out. He didn’t said I stole him, so, rest assured, this is not a copy of Subtraction, neither it’s intended to be a tweaked version of it.

This is in no way intended offensively, but I must say, this design looks crazy lots like Khoi Vin’s iconic Subtraction. It’s a wonderful design, but either (a) this coinciding design aesthetic and execution is an outlier on the distribution of design variability; or (b) you like his stuff, too, and tweaked it just enough that it doesn’t look exactly like his.

Mind you, no judgement; but I’d be curious to see if this is (a).

Regards,

Daniel